To what extent are organisations socially constructed phenomena Essay - 1

To what extent are organisations soci wholey constructed phenomena - Essay ExampleTo understand pagan miscellany in organisations, it would be helpful to understand its roots at a sociological level. Cultural variety show at the workplace is a direct result of multiculturalism in the society. A multicultural society only when denotes a society in which in that location exist several purifications (Watson, 2000). Culture is defined as, A mold of shared assumptions a pigeonholing learned as it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integrating that has worked well enough to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way you think, perceive, and belief in relation to those problems (Schein, 2003). So, a multicultural society has in it antithetic groups, which have learned different ways of thinking, perceiving, and tackling problems that exist in the society. Each group taken individualisticly is a society on its own, with its own individual agriculture. When all these individual societies are brought under one single eye society, the culture of such a society becomes the core culture, with the individual cultures as its subcultures (Watson, 2002). ... A general view of cultural differences is that they affect intercultural encounters, usually by leading to misunderstanding or conflict, at both the individual and group levels (Larkey, 1996). Larkey explains that at the individual level, as different values, beliefs or worldviews are manifested in communication behaviours and as culture creates differing expectations and differing styles or patterns of speech, interpersonal misunderstanding and conflict can arise. At the group level, inter-group processes can be triggered by, for instance, an individuals non-verbal behaviour or ways of speaking which stereotypically represent a group (1996). It then becomes the responsibility of the leadership of the core society to introduce a culture and/or chang e its existing core culture to accommodate the various differences brought in by the subcultures in an integrated manner, where these differences are acknowledged and precious (Lachman et al, 1994). When the above sociological aspects of culture are compared to a business organisation, the organisation is the core society, and its culture, the core culture. We all refer to this as organisational culture. Analogically speaking, the organisational (core) culture should be designed in such a way that the employees of the conjunction share a basic set of values and assumptions, which tie them to that particular organisation. But, on the individual or group levels, each employee has his/her own cultural norms and practices beyond those they share with other members of the company, which can be safely termed as the subcultures within the organisation (Bate, 1995). While different cultural traits offer different identities to different employees, there are usually certain traits shared by all the employees, which give them a